
Income tax dispute resolution is a touchy subject. Crores of disputed money is currently logjammed in the system – capital that can be utilised in a much more efficient manner by citizens and the state alike. Furthermore, the stigma associated with tax raids and tax notices could possibly make taxpayers continue to withhold hidden assets. To address these concerns, the Government this year included the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme within the Income Tax Act 1961, to formalise and simplify the dispute resolution process, and over the long run to also decriminalise the Income Tax Act.
The Act seeks to encourage individuals to disclose all assets and pay their tax dues on time without fear of retribution by authorities.
In this article we will analyse the details of the Vivad se Vishwas Act, what it entails, who it benefits, and also take a look back at previous tax decriminalisation measures undertaken by different Governments.
Table of Contents
The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act proposes waiver of penalties or reduction in payment for dispute settlement if the taxpayer decides to settle and pay under the scheme before a stipulated deadline.
The Bill was introduced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman during her Budget Speech on February 1st 2020 and it gained the President’s assent to become an Act on March 17th. You can read the full text of the Act here.
The initial deadline to avail full waiver on interest and penalties under this scheme was March 31st, post which taxpayers would have had to cough up 10% extra on the disputed tax if they still wanted to avail the scheme. But in light of the nationwide coronavirus lockdown, which began on March 25th, this deadline was later extended to June 30th and then further extended to December 31st.
As of November 30th 2019, there were 483,000 income tax cases pending before appellate authorities. The disputed tax amount is more than ₹9trn ($118bn), which is nearly a year’s direct tax collection for the Government and equivalent to 5% of the country’s GDP.
It is therefore no surprise that the Government is eager to get these cases resolved at the earliest. Not only will it simplify income taxation and ease the pressure on appellate tribunals, but it will also release much-needed tax revenue and increase liquidity in the system.
Under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the Government apparently expects to resolve 90% of income tax disputes. Let us take a look at how exactly this scheme works, who can avail it, and who cannot.
Disputed tax is determined under the Income Tax Act 1961. It is the tax amount that is disputed by the Assessee or the Declarant, as the case may be.
Let us illustrate this with an example. Say, as per your Return of Income you are liable to pay ₹1L ($1,312) as tax. But the Assessment Officer’s order stipulates that tax payable is ₹1.5L ($1,968). The additional ₹50,000 ($656) is now the disputed tax amount.
Similarly, the disputed tax amount can also relate to the interest or penalty involved.
*The June 30th deadline has now being further extended to December 31st.
The Vivad se Vishwas Act is applicable in the following cases:
The appeal may be against disputed tax, interest or penalty. Meaning: the income tax dispute settlement scheme can be availed when the tax arrears (i.e. The disputed tax and/oranyinterest chargeable or charged on disputed tax and/or any penalty leviable or levied on the disputed tax) is a reason of dispute.
As per the Act, its provisions will not apply in the following cases:
To avail the benefits under this Act, the taxpayer (or Declarant) will have to furnish certain documents and forms.
Under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the Government reportedly expects to resolve 90% of income tax disputes.
Vivad se Vishwas is not a one-off scheme. The Government had also taken steps to decriminalise parts of the Companies Act (you will soon read about income tax decriminalisation for companies here). It had also previously passed the “Sabka Vishwas Scheme”, which was a dispute resolution-cum-amnesty scheme for settling pending disputes of service tax and central excises.
Bringing black money and undisclosed assets to the surface has been a top priority for policymakers for a long time. One relatively successful measure was the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme (VDIS) introduced in 1997. It laid the foundation for many such subsequent schemes.
Under the VDIS, any person hoarding undisclosed assets (gold, cash and real estate) would attract a tax of 30% and no penalty. In the year it was introduced, over 350,000 people availed the scheme and disclosed their income and assets. About ₹10,000cr ($1.3bn) was collected under VDIS.
But the scheme was closed on December 31st 1997 after the Supreme Court observed that it was unfair on honest taxpayers and such measures should be avoided.
Striking the right balance between providing a resolution for those with undisclosed assets (because flushing out black money is important) and not instituting a regime where tax offences are taken lightly or go unpunished (thereby creating moral hazard at the expense of honest taxpayers) is a tricky – and crucial – one to make. Such schemes will also need to encourage individuals and companies to come forth and disclose assets in large numbers, and convince them that Income Tax Department authorities won’t come after them for doing so.
Will the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act succeed in its goals and objectives? With the nation in lockdown, it may not be a top priority for policymakers at present. But once the COVID-19 crisis is over and the deadlines passed, numbers will start to roll in and a verdict can be passed. At a time when tax revenues are drying up, the fiscal deficit is widening and an economic catastrophe stares us in the face, simplifying and decriminalising taxation could go a long way in helping the Government and citizens.
FIN.
Want more of what TRANSFIN. Has to offer? How about our Weekly Quizzes? Subscribe to the Quiz Knock Newsletter and get cracking with questions on the top Business and Finance news of the week!